Big Ten refs under fire again after admitting another costly officiating error

The Big Ten released a statement Monday night saying the crew "incorrectly officiated" a roughing the snapper penalty at the end of Nebraska's blowout win over Maryland, according to www.cbssports.com. It is the latest mistake from a group already under scrutiny this season.
The penalty came after Nebraska scored its final touchdown to go up 48-23. Officials enforced the penalty on the ensuing kickoff instead of allowing Nebraska kicker Kyle Cunanan to retry the missed extra point, per the Big Ten statement. The conference said that since the attempt was missed, the penalty should have resulted in a retry with the yardage enforced half the distance to the goal.
"The missed attempt took place after Nebraska took a 48-23 lead when roughing the snapper was called during play," the Big Ten said. "Since the attempt was missed, by rule, the penalty should have resulted in Nebraska retrying the attempt with the penalty yardage enforced half the distance to the goal. However, the miss was allowed to stand and the penalty yardage was incorrectly enforced on the subsequent kickoff."
Much of that same officiating crew — including referee Jim Wharrie, head linesman Ric Hinkamper, back judge Jeff Latkiewicz, side judge Grady Smith and field judge Kyle Debuse — oversaw the controversial ending in Michigan's win over Western Michigan just a few weeks earlier, per www.cbssports.com. In that game, the crew reportedly did not follow proper review protocols when determining whether a second should be added to the clock for one final play. No additional details beyond the Big Ten statement are confirmed.

WHAT HAPPENED ON THE FIELD
Nebraska kicker Kyle Cunanan missed the extra point after the Huskers took a 48-23 lead, but the mistake on the field belonged just as much to the officials, per the Big Ten's Monday night statement.
The roughing the snapper penalty was called during the play, and the conference acknowledged the miss should not have stood. "Since the attempt was missed, by rule, the penalty should have resulted in Nebraska retrying the attempt with the penalty yardage enforced half the distance to the goal," the Big Ten said. "However, the miss was allowed to stand and the penalty yardage was incorrectly enforced on the subsequent kickoff."
That enforcement on the kickoff is where the sequence went sideways. Instead of giving Cunanan another chance from a shorter distance, the officials let the missed point stand and applied the yardage to the restart.

The final score beyond the 48-23 point has not been confirmed, but the conference's admission makes clear the play was botched. The error came from a crew already under scrutiny — referee Jim Wharrie, head linesman Ric Hinkamper, back judge Jeff Latkiewicz, side judge Grady Smith and field judge Kyle Debuse all worked Michigan's controversial win over Western Michigan weeks earlier, per www.cbssports.com.
In that game, the crew reportedly failed to follow proper review protocols on whether a second should be added to the clock for a final play. Now they've admitted another one.
THE CREW'S HISTORY
The same five officials — referee Jim Wharrie, head linesman Ric Hinkamper, back judge Jeff Latkiewicz, side judge Grady Smith and field judge Kyle Debuse — worked Michigan's controversial win over Western Michigan in Ann Arbor weeks earlier, per www.cbssports.com.

In that game, the crew reportedly did not follow proper review protocols when deciding whether a second should be added to the clock for one final play. The specific outcome of that game beyond the controversy has not been confirmed, but the scrutiny followed them to Lincoln.
Saturday's Nebraska-Maryland game produced a combined 28 penalties for 247 yards between the two teams, per the source. That volume of flags gave Nebraska coach Matt Rhule plenty to react to in real time — and the roughing the snapper call at the end turned out to be the one that finally broke through.
RHULE'S EXPLANATION
Nebraska coach Matt Rhule took the blame himself Monday, not the officials who admitted the error.

During his press conference, Rhule said an official approached him about enforcing the roughing the snapper penalty on the kickoff. Rhule couldn't see the extra point attempt from his angle, so he asked a direct question.
"I asked the official,'" Rhule explained. "He said, 'Do you want it on the kickoff?' From my angle, I couldn't really see it, so I said, 'Did he make it?' The official said, 'Yeah, he made it.' So I said, 'We'll take it on the kickoff.'"
Then the scoreboard told a different story.
"Then it was 48. I said, 'Why is it 48?' He said, 'He missed it.' I said, 'I just asked you this.' Poor by me. I'm not gonna blame anybody. It was poor by me."

The exchange came after a game that produced a combined 28 penalties for 247 yards between the two teams. In the immediate aftermath, Rhule was befuddled by how the game was called.
No comment from the officials or the Big Ten beyond Monday night's statement has been confirmed. The conference admitted the crew "incorrectly officiated" the play, but any further action against the five named officials remains unannounced.
WHAT TO WATCH NEXT
The Big Ten has admitted the error, but that is where the public record stops. The conference's Monday night statement says nothing about any further review, disciplinary steps, or changes to how the crew will be assigned going forward.
The five named officials — referee Jim Wharrie, head linesman Ric Hinkamper, back judge Jeff Latkiewicz, side judge Grady Smith and field judge Kyle Debuse — are identified in the statement, but no upcoming assignments for any of them have been listed. Whether they work another Big Ten game this season has not been confirmed.
No additional statement from the conference or the crew has been released beyond Monday night's admission. Any further comment from the Big Ten office, or from the officials themselves, has not been confirmed.
Rhule, for his part, has already moved on from assigning blame. He called his own role in the miscommunication "poor by me" and said he was not going to blame anybody. But in the immediate aftermath, before he had the full explanation, he was "befuddled" by how the game was called.
What comes next is unclear. The Big Ten has acknowledged the mistake, and the coach has owned his part in it. Whether the conference takes any action against the crew, releases another statement, or simply moves forward without further comment remains unannounced.
Advertisement





