AAdminStories worth your time

Nine Black teens accused of rape in 1931 — one recantation that changed the case

Nine Black teens accused of rape in 1931 — one recantation that changed the case

The train was moving through Jackson County, Alabama, on March 25, 1931.

A fight broke out between white teenage boys and Black teenage boys riding as hobos on the freight train.

The white youths were forced off the train.

They reported to authorities that they had been attacked by a gang of Black youths.

The train was stopped in Paint Rock, Alabama.

A posse arrested nine Black youths — the youngest was 13.

The posse also discovered two white women on the train.

The women told authorities they had been raped by the Black youths.

Everything happened in minutes.

The fight, the report, the stop, the arrest.

The case became known as the Scottsboro Boys case, named for the nearby town where the defendants were jailed.

What the record establishes is narrow: a fight, a report, an arrest, an accusation.

What the record does not establish is who was a victim and who was a perpetrator.

The women made accusations.

The youths were charged.

That is where the documented facts end, and the trial begins.

THE ACCUSATION

The two women, Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, told authorities they had been raped by the Black youths.

The case was built almost entirely on the testimony of the two women.

Dr. R.R. Bridges examined the women and testified that his findings were consistent with their account.

He acknowledged he could not confirm rape had occurred.

The medical exam could not confirm rape; that is not established in the record.

There was no physical evidence linking the defendants to the alleged assault.

No bruises, no torn clothing, no witnesses from the train car.

The record shows testimony alone.

The defendants were poor, young, and had no local counsel initially.

They were assigned a lawyer who had not prepared a case.

A lawyer with no file, no investigation, no plan.

The accusation stood on the words of two women.

It was flimsy. It was also enough.

The doctor could not confirm rape. The case proceeded anyway.

What did the jury hear?

They heard the women's account.

They heard the doctor say his findings were consistent.

They did not hear what the record could not establish.

The charge was rape. The evidence was testimony.

That would require more than words; that would require proof.

THE FIRST TRIAL

The first trial began on April 6, 1931, in Scottsboro, Alabama, before Judge A.E. Hawkins.

Prosecutor H.G. Bailey and others presented the case.

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.