AAdminStories worth your time

The police call that sent a bleeding boy back to Dahmer's apartment

The police call that sent a bleeding boy back to Dahmer's apartment

Two Milwaukee police officers answered a call in May 1991 about a naked, bleeding boy.

The boy was Konerak Sinthasomphone, 14 years old.

They found him on the street and returned him to Jeffrey Dahmer, who claimed the boy was his intoxicated adult lover.

The exact words spoken between the officers and Dahmer are not in the record.

Hours later, the boy was dead.

The two officers were disciplined but never criminally charged.

That fact still circulates online as a symbol of systemic failure.

It is a documented fact.

It is also a fact that no officer was charged.

The outrage over the call is viral.

The legal record is thin.

How could that happen?

What came of it?

That would require evidence.

This article examines what the record shows about that call, the investigation, and where the case stands today.

She was on the ground below.

The record is what it is.

The rest is theory.

MAY 1991 — THE BOY RETURNED

Konerak Sinthasomphone was 14 years old.

He was lured to Jeffrey Dahmer’s apartment, where he was drugged.

A call brought Milwaukee police to the scene.

They found the boy naked and bleeding.

Dahmer told the officers the boy was his adult lover, intoxicated.

They left the boy with him.

The boy was murdered that night.

His remains were later identified.

The incident was investigated afterward.

The police call that sent a bleeding boy back to Dahmer's apartment

Two officers were disciplined but not criminally charged.

No officer was ever charged.

The precise timeline of events inside the apartment after the officers left is not in the record.

What is in the record is the call, the response, and the return.

What is in the record is that a bleeding 14-year-old was handed back.

What is in the record is that the officers accepted the word of the man who had drugged him.

The officers believed the lie.

The lie cost a life.

It is a documented failure.

It is also a documented non-prosecution.

That is the line the outrage keeps crossing.

The call happened in May 1991.

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.