Two men in police caps, one hour, and the empty frames in Boston
It is 1:24 a.m. on March 18, 1990, and the side door of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum opens.
Two men stand there in Boston police caps, dark uniforms, and fake mustaches.
They tell the young night guard, Richard Abath, that they are responding to a disturbance call.
The security camera footage shows Abath buzzing them in through that side door.
The footage shows the two men in police uniforms and caps, nothing more.
It does not show their faces clearly.
It does not show their names.
The record does not establish who the two men were.
They claim they are police, so Abath lets them past the locked entrance.
Then they overpower both guards on duty, bind them with duct tape, and walk them down to the basement.
The guards are left there, taped and helpless, while the men go back upstairs.
For the next hour and a half, the men move through the galleries.
They cut paintings from their frames.
They take thirteen works: a Vermeer, several Rembrandts, a Manet, a Degas, a Chinese bronze beaker.
They bypass other, more valuable pieces — which investigators would later say suggested inside knowledge.
The men leave the way they came, through the side door, carrying the art.
The guards stay bound in the basement until morning.
The day-shift guard arrives and finds them.
The frames are empty.
The men in the caps are gone.
The question hangs there, unanswered for decades: who were they?
That would require evidence.
The record offers only the footage: two men in police caps, one hour and a half, and an open door.
THE BOUND GUARDS
The day-shift guard arrived that morning and found them.
Richard Abath and the unnamed second guard, bound with duct tape, placed in the basement.
What they said during the hour and a half the thieves moved through the galleries is not in the record.
No testimony, no transcript, no statement from that night.
The record holds only what came after: the discovery, the cuts, the tape.
Abath was the one on the footage, letting the men in through the side door.
He has been questioned repeatedly over the years.
He has never been charged.
The second guard has never been named in the coverage.
Anne Hawley was the museum's director then.
She became the public face of the loss.
She led the response for decades, through the FBI's leads and the empty frames and the reward offers.
The museum itself was the other victim.
Isabella Stewart Gardner founded it and stipulated in her will that the collection be displayed permanently, exactly as she arranged it.
The will made the loss a kind of violation of the founder's instruction.
The empty spaces were not just theft.
They were a break from the arrangement she had fixed.
The morning guard found the bound men and raised the alarm.
The police came.
Then the FBI.
Then the questions, which have never stopped.
Abath maintained his innocence and cooperated.
The second guard's story is not in the record.
That is what the record does not establish: what the guards said, what they did, what they saw.
Only the tape, and the basement, and the morning discovery.
THE INVESTIGATION
The FBI immediately took over the investigation, working with Boston police.
Investigators found that the thieves knew exactly which artworks to take, bypassing more valuable pieces.
That suggested inside knowledge.
It suggested someone had told them what the walls held and what the walls could spare.
Over the years, the FBI pursued numerous leads.
Leads about organized crime figures in Boston.
Leads about possible connections to the Irish Republican Army.
Leads that went nowhere.
In 2013, the FBI announced it believed it had identified the thieves.
The bureau said the men were deceased, and that the art had been moved out of the region.
Who those men were, the public record does not establish.
That is not established: the identity of the thieves.
In 2015, the FBI released surveillance footage and images of the two men in police caps.
The release was an effort to generate new leads.
The footage showed the men entering, the side door, the guards.
It showed one guard, Richard Abath, letting them in.
It did not show their faces clearly enough to name them.
The FBI has offered a $5 million reward for information leading to the recovery of the art.
The museum has matched that amount.
Ten million dollars for the return of what was taken.
The leads kept coming.
The leads kept dying.
Did the art leave Boston that night, or the next day, or years later?
Did the men in the caps act alone, or did they answer to someone else?
That would require evidence.
The record holds the tape, the rewards, and the announcement.
It does not hold the names, or the paintings, or the hour the frames went empty.
THE EMPTY FRAMES
The empty frames still hang in the galleries.
Isabella Stewart Gardner’s will asked that the collection remain exactly as she arranged it.
The museum honors that wish by leaving the vacant spaces on the walls.
The gilded outlines hold nothing.
Vermeer's "The Concert" is not there.
Rembrandt's "The Storm on the Sea of Galilee" is not there.
Thirteen works are gone, and the frames mark the loss like placeholders for the dead.
Anne Hawley retired as director in 2015.
She had led the museum through the long aftermath, the decades of waiting, the repeated announcements of nothing.
Richard Abath maintained his innocence.
He cooperated with investigators, he said, again and again.
He was questioned, never charged.
There has been no trial in this case.
No one has ever been arrested.
No one has ever been charged with the theft.
What happened to the art after the theft is not established by the record.
Not by the tape.
Not by the rewards.
Not by the announcement in 2013 that the FBI believed it had identified the thieves, who were said to be dead.
The frames do not answer.
They simply hang, empty, in the permanent arrangement of a woman who wished her collection unchanged.
The loss has a strange permanence.
The absence is the exhibit now.
The walls wait.
The reward waits.
The record holds no names, no paintings, no hour when the frames went empty.
It holds only the frames themselves.
AND THE STORY STILL ISN'T OVER
The case remains open.
The FBI still calls it one of its top art-crime investigations.
The statute of limitations for the theft itself has expired.
Anyone in possession of the stolen art could still face charges for possession of stolen property.
That distinction is the whole case in miniature: the act is old, the holding is current.
The FBI continues to appeal to the public for information.
The reward waits.
The stolen art has never been recovered.
Not because the trail went cold entirely. Because the trail never produced a name.
The current location of the stolen art is not established.
It is not established where the Vermeer hangs, or the Rembrandt, or the Manet, or the Degas, or the bronze beaker.
It is not established who took them, beyond two men in police caps on a camera.
It is not established what happened in that hour and a half.
The record holds no names, no paintings, no hour when the frames went empty.
It holds only the frames themselves.
They still hang in Boston.
Empty frames, in the galleries where the paintings once hung, as Isabella Stewart Gardner's will demanded the collection remain unchanged.
The museum kept them. The public walks past them.
The case is open, and the frames are empty, and the questions are unanswered.
Who were the men in the caps?
Where did the art go?
Why did the thieves know which pieces to take?
That would require evidence.
The FBI continues to ask.
Advertisement
You may also like
The $50,000 ransom note left on a nursery windowsill — and the 11-hour jury deliberation that followed
On the evening of March 1, 1932, a ransom note demanding $50,000 was found on a nursery windowsill in the Lindbergh home near Hopewell,…
A mother's shopping trip, a Sears toy aisle, and the six-year-old who never came home
The Sears store at the Hollywood Mall had an air-conditioned hum and a toy aisle that ran long and bright. On July 27, 1981,…
The traffic stop that caught a bombing suspect before the FBI did
The trooper saw the plate first, or rather, he didn't see it. The 1977 Mercury Marquis had no license plate, and that was enough.…
The 14-year-old boy Milwaukee police returned to Dahmer hours before his death
A boy was wandering the street in Milwaukee, drugged and naked. Neighbors reported him in May 1991. Police officers responded to the call. They…
The 1934 torso washing ashore that set off a four-year hunt
The water gave her back on September 5, 1934. A woman's torso, washed up on the shore of Lake Erie near Euclid Beach. She…
Two gas-station murders, one .22 pistol: the timeline the jury followed
The evening of July 19, 1976, in Orem, Utah, was warm and ordinary. A young man walked up to two college students at a…