AAdminStories worth your time

The $100 million compensation fund that still cannot close the Epstein case

The $100 million compensation fund that still cannot close the Epstein case

The estate of Jeffrey Epstein has paid out over $100 million to victims through a compensation fund.

The fund exists because Epstein died by suicide on August 10, 2019, in his Manhattan jail cell before trial.

His brother Mark Epstein manages the estate.

The estate has sold properties to pay settlements: the Palm Beach mansion, the Manhattan townhouse.

No other co-conspirators have been charged.

Victims continue to pursue claims against the estate.

In some cases, they pursue claims against banks and others alleged to have facilitated the abuse.

A large payout is not the same as closure.

The exact number of claimants is not in the record.

The current balance of the fund is not in the record.

What remains unresolved?

Who else might have been involved?

What did the money actually settle?

That would require evidence.

The record shows one conviction and a nine-figure payout.

It does not show a closed case.

THE 2005 COMPLAINT AND THE 2008 PLEA

It began with a mother in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2005.

She reported that Epstein had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter.

Detective Joseph Recarey led the initial investigation.

He interviewed dozens of girls.

He gathered financial records that showed Epstein paid victims.

The case grew, and the FBI became involved.

Then came the deal.

In 2007, then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta negotiated a non-prosecution agreement.

That agreement allowed Epstein to plead guilty in 2008 to state charges of soliciting a minor and procuring a minor for prostitution.

He served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail.

He served them with extensive work release.

He was required to register as a sex offender.

The specific terms of that work release schedule are not detailed in the record.

The deal shaped everything that followed.

A federal judge later ruled the non-prosecution agreement illegal.

It violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, the judge found, because victims were not notified.

The government did not reopen the case after that ruling.

Not because the ruling was reversed.

But because the government chose not to act.

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.