The 911 call a mother made at 5:52 a.m. — the ransom note that followed
The 911 call came at 5:52 a.m.
December 26, 1996, in Boulder, Colorado.
Patsy Ramsey's voice on the line, reporting her 6-year-old daughter, JonBenét, kidnapped.
A ransom note demanding $118,000 was found on the back staircase of the family home.
Nearly three pages long, written on paper from the family's own notepad.
No signs of forced entry were found by investigators.
Two things from that morning are not in dispute: the call, and the note.
Who wrote the note is not established by the record.
What exactly Patsy Ramsey said beyond the report is not established by the record.
The theories fill the space where the facts end.
Detective Steve Thomas would later argue Patsy wrote it. Lou Smit, hired by the defense, argued an intruder did.
The record holds the call time, the note's length, the paper's origin, the absence of forced entry.
It does not hold a writer.
It does not hold a voice beyond the report.
The call was made. The note was found.
The mother's words on the line, the words on the stairs.
One led to the other, and neither led to an answer.
Not because the evidence was thin.
Because the morning ended with a body in a basement wine cellar, discovered by the father later that afternoon.
She was 6 years old.
The call at 5:52 a.m. was the first public sound of a case that never closed.
The note was the first written artifact.
Both remain.
Both remain unresolved.
THE FAMILY'S MORNING
JonBenét Ramsey was six years old.
She was a beauty pageant contestant, known for her blonde curls and her stage presence.
Her parents, John and Patsy Ramsey, reported her missing at 5:52 that morning.
By the afternoon, the case was no longer a kidnapping.
John Ramsey found her body in a basement wine cellar.
She had been strangled with a garrote.
She had been struck on the head.
An autopsy determined the cause of death: asphyxia due to strangulation, with a skull fracture also present.
The family's morning had become an unthinkable afternoon.
John and Patsy Ramsey were initially considered suspects.
They were never charged.
John Ramsey's older children from a previous marriage — a son and a daughter — were also in the home that morning.
The son was later cleared by DNA evidence.
The daughter was never charged with anything.
What exactly happened between the 911 call and the discovery of the body is not in the record.
The ransom note demanded $118,000.
It was written on paper from the family's own notepad.
It was nearly three pages long.
It was the first written artifact.
Both remain.
Both remain unresolved.
TWO THEORIES, ONE NOTE
Steve Thomas, the lead detective for the Boulder Police Department, resigned in 1998.
In 2000 he published a book arguing Patsy Ramsey wrote the ransom note and killed her daughter.
Lou Smit, a former detective hired by the Ramsey defense, concluded the opposite.
He pointed to a basement window and a stun gun as possible evidence of an intruder.
The note itself is a fact of the record.
It demanded $118,000 and was written on paper from the family's own notepad.
Detectives collected DNA samples from the victim's clothing.
Those samples did not match any family member.
In 2008, the Boulder District Attorney's office, led by Mary Lacy, formally exonerated the Ramsey family.
The DA's office stated that DNA evidence from an unidentified male excluded all family members.
So there are two stories built from the same facts.
One says the mother wrote the note.
One says a stranger came through the house and left it.
Both have books.
Both have careers behind them.
Both remain unresolved.
Whether Patsy Ramsey or an intruder wrote the note is not established by the record.
The note is three pages long.
It is written in a voice that commands.
It is written on paper the family owned.
It asks for a sum close to John Ramsey's bonus that year.
That last fact is documented.
What it means is not.
The DNA excludes the family.
The DNA does not name anyone else.
The profile sits in CODIS, and no match has ever been found.
A detective built a case on the mother.
A detective built a case on the stranger.
The evidence supports both readings.
The evidence settles neither.
That is the shape of the record: a note, a body, two theories.
The reader is left to choose.
Choosing would require evidence the file does not contain.
THE GRAND JURY'S SECRET
In 1999, a Boulder County grand jury voted to indict John and Patsy Ramsey on charges of child abuse resulting in death.
District Attorney Alex Hunter declined to sign the indictments, citing insufficient evidence.
Why Hunter declined is not fully established in the record.
The grand jury's decision stayed secret for fourteen years.
In 2013, a court order forced the release of the indictments.
The names were there. The charges were there. The signatures were not.
In 2006, a man named John Mark Karr was arrested in Bangkok, Thailand.
He claimed he was with JonBenét when she died.
He was extradited to Colorado.
DNA testing excluded him.
The charges were dropped.
He was released and returned to Thailand.
The DNA profile from the victim's clothing was entered into CODIS, the national database.
No match was ever found.
It is a database built to catch one person. It has never caught that person.
No one was ever charged with JonBenét Ramsey's murder.
That is the plainest sentence in the file.
The grand jury heard evidence. The grand jury voted. The district attorney declined.
The record holds the vote. The record holds the decline. The record does not hold the reason.
The Ramsey family was formally exonerated in 2008, when the Boulder District Attorney's office stated that DNA from an unidentified male excluded all family members.
That statement was also part of the record.
Two things can sit in the same file and still not resolve each other.
John Mark Karr was cleared by science. The grand jury's indictments were buried by a signature that never came.
Both are documented. Neither is an answer.
A grand jury voted. A district attorney declined. A suspect was arrested. A suspect was cleared.
The case remains officially unsolved.
AND THE STORY STILL ISN'T OVER
Patsy Ramsey died of ovarian cancer in 2006, according to the case record.
She never saw the case solved.
John Ramsey has continued to advocate for renewed investigation, according to his public statements.
He has criticized the Boulder Police Department's handling of the case.
In 2023, the Boulder Police Department announced it was re-testing DNA evidence using new technology.
What that re-testing will find is not known.
The case remains officially unsolved — that is the record, according to the case record.
It is also a case that has been the subject of numerous books, documentaries, and media coverage.
No arrest has ever been made.
Not because the theories ran out. But because the evidence did not run to an answer.
A grand jury voted. A district attorney declined. A suspect was arrested. A suspect was cleared.
That is not a resolution. That is a list of things that happened.
The DNA profile sits in CODIS. No match was found.
John Ramsey has kept speaking. The police have kept testing.
What they will find is not established.
That would require evidence.
The story still isn't over.
But the record is what it is: a 911 call at 5:52 a.m., a ransom note, a body in a wine cellar, and no one charged.
Patsy Ramsey is gone. The case remains.
What the 2023 re-testing will show, no one can say.
Advertisement
You may also like
The 19-year-old nurse's aide whose brother spent decades doubting the confession
She was nineteen. A nurse's aide. On January 4, 1964, Mary Sullivan was found dead in her rented apartment. She was the final victim…
Two Utah robberies, one witness, and the .22-caliber pistol that sealed Gary Gilmore's fate
The first shot came at a Sinclair station in Provo, Utah, on the night of July 19, 1976. A 24-year-old gas station attendant was…
The fake police car that drove away from a garage at 10:30 a.m.
The garage door at 2122 North Clark Street stood open. A resident found it that way and looked inside. Seven men were dead on…
The 1987 saliva sample that sat unmatched for 14 years — then broke the Green River case
A warrant in 1987 gave investigators a saliva sample from Gary Ridgway, a truck painter at a Kenworth plant in Renton. The sample was…
The glasses Ronald Goldman was returning when he was stabbed — and the family who never stopped asking
He was 25 years old, a waiter at a nearby restaurant. On the night of June 12, 1994, he was returning a pair of…
Two men in police caps, one hour, and the empty frames in Boston
It is 1:24 a.m. on March 18, 1990, and the side door of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum opens. Two men stand there in…