AAdminStories worth your time

The blood spatter on MacDonald's pajama top that contradicted his story of fighting intruders

The blood spatter on MacDonald's pajama top that contradicted his story of fighting intruders

The pajama top was folded on the evidence table in Raleigh, North Carolina, in the summer of 1979.

It belonged to Captain Jeffrey MacDonald, an army physician at Fort Bragg.

On February 17, 1970, he told military police that four intruders—three men and a woman—had broken into his base housing.

He said they chanted "acid is groovy" as they attacked.

They killed his wife, Colette, and his daughters, Kimberley, age 5, and Kristen, age 2.

They died from stab wounds and blunt-force injuries.

MacDonald had minor injuries.

He said he fought them.

The pajama top he wore that night told a different story.

The FBI serologist testified about what he found on the fabric.

The blood was concentrated in small, distinct droplets.

Not the chaotic, smeared pattern a violent struggle would leave.

Not the pattern of a man grappling with intruders.

Small droplets, evenly distributed.

That would require evidence.

The prosecution argued the droplets suggested he was not in the midst of a fight.

The defense argued the evidence was contaminated.

The identity of any intruders is not established.

No such group was ever identified.

The top sat there, a quiet object, holding the case's central question.

How did the blood get on it?

The answer, the prosecution said, was in the pattern itself.

The defense said the investigation was botched.

The droplets remained.

THE 911 CALL AND THE FIRST STORY

The military police who answered the call that night accepted MacDonald's story.

Intruders, he said. Three men and a woman who chanted "acid is groovy" and attacked his family while he fought them.

The initial investigation closed around that account.

Colette's parents did not let it close for long.

They had supported MacDonald at first, according to the record, standing beside him in the aftermath.

Then the inconsistencies emerged, and they became vocal advocates for prosecution.

In 1970, the Army's Criminal Investigation Division reopened the case.

The lead CID investigator testified at trial about the reinvestigation, about what the second look turned over.

MacDonald's statements changed over time.

The prosecution later used those changes against him, pointing to a story that would not hold still.

Not because the changes were dramatic. Because they were small.

A detail here, a sequence there, the kind of drift that comes from a tale being retold rather than a memory being recovered.

The exact content of those shifting statements is not in the record beyond the general claim of intruders.

That would require evidence.

The blood spatter on MacDonald's pajama top that contradicted his story of fighting intruders

What the record does show is a story that began as accepted fact and ended as the center of a murder trial.

The first story was believed.

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.