The ex-convict's tip about a safe that sent detectives to a Kansas farmhouse

He told prison authorities that Richard Hickock had spoken of robbing the Clutter farm.
Floyd Wells was a former cellmate. He had worked for Herbert Clutter and knew the layout of the house.
Weeks after the murders, the case had few leads. There was no clear motive, no forced entry, no weapon.
Wells said he had told Hickock about a safe he believed was kept at the farm. The safe itself was never mentioned as found at the crime scene—only as a belief Wells held.
Whether the safe actually existed or was ever located is not established.
A man in prison, talking about a safe that may not have been there. That was the lead.
It sent investigators to a Kansas farmhouse where four people had been bound and shot at close range. Herbert Clutter, his wife Bonnie, their daughter Nancy, their son Kenyon—all dead since the night of November 15, 1959.
The family had failed to attend church. Friends and neighbors came to the house the next morning and found the bodies.
No one had heard a shot. No one had seen a stranger.
Then a cellmate's word gave the case a motive—robbery—and a suspect.
Not because the safe was found. Because a man who knew the house said it was there.
THE NIGHT OF NOVEMBER 15
The night of November 15, 1959, the Clutter family was murdered in their farmhouse near Holcomb, Kansas.
Herbert Clutter was a wealthy farmer, a prominent man in the community.
His wife, Bonnie, suffered from chronic health problems.
Their daughter Nancy was sixteen. Their son Kenyon was fifteen.
Two older daughters, Eveanna and Beverly, were married and lived away from home.
The family failed to appear at church the next morning. They also missed a planned outing.
Friends and neighbors came to the house to check on them. They found the bodies.
The victims had been bound. Each had been shot at close range with a shotgun.
The crime scene showed no signs of forced entry. The doors were not broken.
The motive was unclear. Nothing seemed taken, nothing seemed disturbed.
The house stood alone in the flat Kansas land. It was a place where people did not lock their doors.
There was no sign of a struggle heard. No one in the nearby town reported a sound.
The exact sequence of events inside the house is not detailed in the source. That remains unknown.
What was known was the horror of it. What was known was the confusion.

Four people, bound and shot, in a home that offered no resistance.
The investigation produced few leads. There was no obvious reason for the crime.
It was not a robbery that left a mess. It was not a quarrel with a witness.
It was a violent intrusion into a seemingly secure home. And it made no sense.
THE CELLMATE'S STORY
The break came from a prison cell.
Floyd Wells, a former cellmate of Richard Hickock, told prison authorities that Hickock had spoken of robbing the Clutter farm.
Wells had worked for Herbert Clutter.
He knew the layout of the house.
He told Hickock about a safe he believed was kept there.
The tip gave investigators a motive: robbery.
It gave them a suspect.
Hickock and Smith were arrested in Las Vegas, Nevada, on December 30, 1959.
They were traced through a stolen car and other evidence.
The exact nature of that "other evidence" is not specified in the source.
Both men confessed to the murders.
They gave conflicting accounts of who fired the shots.
One said the other pulled the trigger.
The other said the first one did.
The shotgun was never recovered.
Wells was a convict testifying about a conversation in a cell.
His word sent investigators west.
It was enough to move a stalled case.
It was also the word of a man who had once worked for the man now dead.
The Clutters had trusted him with their home.
He gave that trust to a man who used it for a robbery that became something worse.

Not because Wells wanted the murders.
But because he wanted a share of a safe that was never found.
The relief of a lead came with the unease of its source.
The confessions came with their own ambiguity.
Two men in a room, and the record still does not say which hand held the gun that fired the fatal shots.
That would require evidence the case never produced.
THE TRIAL AND THE CONFESSIONS
The trial opened in March 1960 in Finney County, Kansas.
Hickock and Smith sat together in the courtroom, charged with four counts of first-degree murder.
The prosecution built its case on joint culpability: two men, one plan, four deaths.
The defense tried to pull the two apart, suggesting one man was more responsible than the other.
It was a question of hands.
Both men confessed, but their confessions disagreed on whose hands held the shotgun.
The record does not establish the specific arguments the defense made.
That part of the story is not detailed in the source.
The jury heard the conflicting accounts, weighed the same facts, and reached one verdict.
They found both men guilty on all four counts.
They recommended the death penalty.
The judge sentenced both men to death.
The convictions were upheld on appeal, including a review by the Kansas Supreme Court.
The legal question was settled.
The factual one was not.
Who fired the shots?
Who pulled the trigger first?
Who was the actor, and who was the accomplice?
That would require evidence the case never produced.
.jpg?format=2500w)
The trial answered the charge.
It did not answer the ambiguity.
Two men were condemned for the same crime, but the record still does not say which hand held the gun that fired the fatal shots.
It is a joint verdict.
It is also a divided story.
AND THE STORY STILL ISN'T OVER
They were hanged on the same morning, April 14, 1965, at the Kansas State Penitentiary in Lansing.
Truman Capote was there.
He wrote about it, and the book came out the next year, in 1966, and the crime became famous around the world.
The farmhouse where the Clutters died was later demolished.
The ground was cleared, and the story stayed.
The surviving daughters, Eveanna and Beverly, went on living.
They lived private lives after the murders.
The case has been adapted into films and television programs, but the family members themselves largely avoided public attention.
They did not become characters.
They did not give interviews that made the papers.
What remains is the weapon.
The murder weapon, a 12-gauge shotgun, was never recovered.
That is not established.
The exact truth of who fired the fatal shots is not established either.
The two men confessed, but their accounts conflicted, and the record does not say which hand held the gun.
It is a closed case.
It is an open question.
The daughters carried the loss without the answer.
The farmhouse is gone, and the safe that started it all was never found in it.
The story is over.
The story is not over.
Advertisement





