AAdminStories worth your time

The glasses with the uncommon hinge that led police to a University of Chicago student

The glasses with the uncommon hinge that led police to a University of Chicago student

The glasses sat in the mud near the culvert, their hinge catching the light.

On May 22, 1924, a body was found in a culvert near the Indiana border.

The victim was 14-year-old Robert "Bobby" Franks.

Near the body, police found a pair of eyeglasses.

Not a confession. Not a witness. A hinge.

The hinge was uncommon, a unique mechanism that an optician in Chicago could trace.

He identified the glasses as belonging to Nathan Leopold, a 19-year-old University of Chicago student.

That single object turned a missing-person report into a murder investigation.

Leopold initially claimed he dropped the glasses during a bird-watching trip.

His alibi collapsed under questioning.

The glasses are the documented object that broke the case open.

It is not established that they were the only piece of evidence; the record notes they were a key breakthrough, not the sole one.

But the hinge pointed the finger.

A boy reported missing. A body in the culvert. A pair of glasses with a rare hinge.

What else did the police find? What did the optician remember about the man who bought them?

That would require evidence.

The hinge did the talking first.

TWO STUDENTS AND A RENTED CAR

They were University of Chicago students, both of them.

Nathan Leopold was 19. Richard Loeb was 18.

They were the sons of prominent families, and they were still teenagers.

On May 21, 1924, they drove a rented Willys-Knight automobile.

The victim was 14-year-old Robert "Bobby" Franks, walking home from school.

The case record states they kidnapped him in that car.

The case record states they killed him with a chisel.

Then they attempted to collect a $10,000 ransom from the Franks family.

The ransom note was never collected.

According to their later confessions, the motive was a desire to commit the "perfect crime."

Not a crime of anger. A crime of ambition.

They planned it, the confessions say, to prove they could get away with it.

Two teenagers from prominent families, and they thought they could commit the perfect crime.

What did they think would happen when the body was found?

What did they think the ransom would buy them?

What did they think a chisel and a rented car would prove?

That would require evidence, and the record does not supply it.

The exact sequence of events on May 21 is not detailed in the record.

Where the car was driven, when the chisel was used — that is not established.

What is established is the arc: the rental, the ride, the chisel, the note.

The glasses with the uncommon hinge that led police to a University of Chicago student

The note was never collected.

The body was found the next day, in a culvert near the Indiana border.

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.