AAdminStories worth your time

The misread clue that derailed the Tate murder probe for months

The misread clue that derailed the Tate murder probe for months

Five people were found dead at 10050 Cielo Drive in Benedict Canyon on the morning of August 10, 1969.

Among them was actress Sharon Tate, eight months pregnant.

Also dead were coffee heiress Abigail Folger, a hairstylist, a writer, and a visitor.

The housekeeper discovered the bodies.

Drugs were present at the scene.

The victims had connections to the entertainment industry.

So the initial investigation followed a theory: this was a drug-related killing.

It was a documented mistake.

The drug theory slowed the case for months.

Not because the drugs were irrelevant. But because the drugs were a clue pointing the wrong way.

How could a clue lead them so wrong?

What exactly was misread?

What did the scene suggest that the record does not support?

That would require evidence.

The source does not specify the exact nature of the misread clue.

It states only that the theory was mistaken.

The theory was a fact of the investigation. The theory was not a fact of the case.

The case sat on that error.

It sat there while the real trail went cold.

THE DRUG THEORY

The drug theory came from the victims’ connections to the entertainment industry and the presence of drugs at the scene.

The misread clue that derailed the Tate murder probe for months

It was a documented mistake.

The lead detective led the LAPD investigation on that error.

He followed the drugs.

He followed the names the drugs led him to.

What the record does not establish is the specific evidence that pointed first to drugs.

That detail is not in the source.

The theory was a fact of the investigation.

The theory was not a fact of the case.

One night later, August 10, 1969, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca were murdered in their Los Feliz home.

Two crime scenes.

Two sets of bodies.

One investigation that did not connect them.

The failure to link the Tate and LaBianca killings quickly delayed a unified investigation.

That delay was a turning point.

It was also a choice.

Not because the scenes were clean.

But because the drug theory had already set the direction.

Every day the case followed the theory, the real trail went colder.

The LaBianca murders sat in a separate file.

The Tate murders sat in another.

The lead detective’s team worked one.

The misread clue that derailed the Tate murder probe for months

The other waited.

Could a faster connection have changed the outcome?

Could a clearer read of the scenes have pointed to Spahn Ranch sooner?

The rest of this article is locked

Watch one short ad to unlock and keep reading.