The tarot card message that turned a random killing spree into a hunt for 'God'

🚨 THE TAROT CARD THAT READ 'CALL ME GOD'
The card was a piece of evidence, found at a crime scene during the investigation of the October 2002 shootings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., area.
The handwritten message read "Call me God."
The words turned a random killing spree into a hunt for a self-styled deity.
The card is documented.
It exists in the record of the case, a tangible object retrieved by police, its message preserved.
But what the message meant was never established.
It is not known if it was a taunt, a signature, or something else entirely.
The intent behind the tarot card message is not established.
The card is a documented piece of evidence, yet any interpretation of it as a motive or taunt remains speculative.
Who wrote it?
Why was it left?
Was it meant to be found?
That would require evidence.
The record does not provide it.
The card became a symbol of the attack, a chilling layer on top of the randomness.
The shootings themselves were random, with no apparent connection between victims.
People were shot while pumping gas, mowing a lawn, loading groceries.
The first killing occurred on October 2 outside a grocery store in Wheaton, Maryland.
The victim was James D. Martin, described by his family as a beloved father and husband.
The attack appeared random.
The card offered a different kind of question.
It suggested a mind behind the chaos, a voice claiming authority over the fear.
But the voice was never proven to be anything more than ink on cardboard.
OCTOBER 2 — THE FIRST SHOT OUTSIDE A GROCERY STORE
October 2 began like any other Tuesday in Wheaton, Maryland.
James D. Martin had finished his shopping and was loading his groceries into his car.
The store was a small shopping center on University Boulevard, a place where neighbors ran into neighbors.
The shot came without warning.
Martin fell to the ground beside his vehicle.
He was 55 years old, a man his family would later describe as a beloved father and husband.
The killing appeared random. No connection to the victim has ever been established.
Police arrived to find a body, a car half-loaded with groceries, and no motive.
They had no suspects.
They had no explanation for why James D. Martin, of all people, was dead.
His family spoke publicly in the days that followed, describing the sudden void in their lives.
They described a husband who was dependable, a father who was present.
They did not describe an enemy. They did not describe a reason.
The attack appeared to be a lottery of place and time, a matter of being in the wrong parking lot at the wrong moment.
That would be the shape of the fear to come.
Not because anyone knew who was shooting. But because no one knew why.
The record does not establish a motive for the attack on Martin.
It establishes only that he was killed, and that his death was the first.
23 DAYS OF FEAR — PUMPING GAS, MOWING A LAWN, LOADING GROCERIES
It lasted 23 days.
Ten people were killed and three others wounded in Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
A man was shot while loading groceries into his minivan.
A man was shot while mowing the lawn at a car dealership.
A man was shot while pumping gas at a Shell station.
A woman was shot while sitting on a bench at a bus stop.
Each victim was doing something ordinary.
Each attack left no apparent connection between the shooter and the shot.
The randomness caused widespread fear across the region.
Schools kept children indoors during recess.
Adults zigzagged as they walked to their cars in parking lots, trying to make themselves harder to hit.
People held their breath at gas pumps.
The final fatal attack came on October 22, when a bus driver was killed in Aspen Hill, Maryland.
He was standing on the steps of his bus.
The record does not establish why he was chosen.
It establishes only that he was the last.
The source names ten of the dead: James D. Martin, James L. Buchanan, Premkumar Walekar, Sarah Ramos, Lori Ann Lewis-Rivera, Pascal Charlot, Dean Harold Meyers, Kenneth Bridges, Linda Franklin, and Conrad Johnson.
It does not list every victim's identity in full.
But the named ones were people with routines, with families, with ordinary Tuesdays.
Linda Franklin was an FBI analyst, killed outside a Home Depot.
Her husband was with her when she was shot.
He was not hit.
He later spoke publicly about the sudden void in his family's life.

James D. Martin was the first, described by his family as a beloved father and husband.
The fear was not abstract.
It was the fear of a lawn, a pump, a grocery bag.
It was the fear of being seen.
THE WITNESS AND THE WHITE VAN — A FALSE LEAD
The fear was not abstract.
It was the fear of a lawn, a pump, a grocery bag.
It was the fear of being seen.
Then, in September 2002, a witness at a shooting in Montgomery County, Alabama, gave police something they did not have.
A description.
The witness described a white van.
That description became the focus of the investigation.
Every tip, every sighting, every roadblock was built around a white van.
Police stopped white vans across the region.
They searched white vans.
They cleared white vans.
The white van was the lead.
It was the wrong lead.
The actual vehicle was a dark blue Chevrolet Caprice.
The witness's description was later abandoned.
The mistake cost time.
It allowed the snipers to keep shooting.
The specific details of that witness's description are not in the source.
What is in the source is the cost.
The attacks continued.
The fear continued.
The wrong turn was a fact.
The frustration was a fact.
The pressure on investigators was a fact.
They had a description, and the description was wrong.
They had a vehicle, and the vehicle was not it.
They had a witness, and the witness pointed them away.
That would require evidence.
The evidence came later, in a dark blue car.
THE TAROT CARD — A MESSAGE FROM 'GOD'
They had a witness, and the witness pointed them away from a white van.
That would require evidence.
The evidence came later, in a dark blue car.
But before the car, there was a card.
Police found a tarot card at a crime scene with the message "Call me God" written on it.
It was the Death card, according to investigators at the time.
Who wrote it and why is not established in the record.
The card became a turning point in the investigation.
It turned the hunt into a search for a self-proclaimed deity.
Not for a man with a rifle.
For someone who wanted to be called God.
The message was documented.
The meaning was not.
It was a piece of evidence, and it was also a taunt.
It was a clue, and it was also a question.
Did the shooter leave it deliberately, or did it fall from a pocket?
Was it a signature, a joke, or a confession of something larger?
That would require evidence.
The record does not provide it.
The card sat in the case file, chilling and unexplained.
It turned a random killing spree into a hunt for a god.
But a god who writes on tarot cards still bleeds.
And a god who bleeds can be caught.
THE MODIFIED CAPRICE — A SHOOTER IN THE TRUNK
They found the car at a rest stop near Myersville, Maryland.
It was a dark blue Chevrolet Caprice, and the two suspects were sleeping inside it.
The trunk had a hole cut into it.
A shooter could lie in that trunk, fire through the hole, and never be seen.
The rifle was a Bushmaster, a .223-caliber weapon.
Ballistics linked the bullets found at the crime scenes to that rifle.
The car was the dark blue Caprice, not the white van police had chased for so long.
The white van had been a false lead, a witness's description that sent the investigation in the wrong direction.

The Caprice was the real thing.
It was a cold calculation, a modification made for murder.
The exact date the car was modified is not in the source material.
What is documented is the hole, the rifle, and the two men asleep in the car when the motorist called the tip in.
What is documented is the scope and the other evidence found inside.
What is documented is that the car was a killing platform, engineered for a shooter to vanish into the ordinary.
A god who bleeds can be caught.
A god who sleeps in a modified Caprice at a rest stop can be arrested.
The car did not explain the message on the tarot card.
It did not explain the randomness, the gas stations, the lawns, the loading of groceries.
It explained how, not why.
That would require evidence the record does not establish.
THE ARREST — A TIP FROM A MOTORIST
A motorist called in a tip about a parked Caprice at a rest stop near Myersville, Maryland.
The caller's identity is not in the record.
The car was dark blue, not the white van police had spent weeks chasing.
Two men were asleep inside.
They were John Allen Muhammad, 41, and Lee Boyd Malvo, 17.
The arrest came on October 24, 2002, after 23 days of shootings.
Inside the car, police found the rifle.
A Bushmaster .223-caliber.
A scope.
Other evidence, the record says, without listing what else.
The rifle matched the ballistics from the attacks.
The Caprice had a hole cut in the trunk, allowing a shooter to fire from inside without being seen.
Muhammad and Malvo did not resist.
They were taken into custody while they slept.
The manhunt that had emptied schoolyards and sent people zigzagging to their cars ended at a rest stop off the highway.
It ended quietly, in the dark, with two men asleep in a modified sedan.
The evidence inside the car would later anchor two trials.
The rifle, the scope, the hole in the trunk.
What the car did not contain was an explanation.
No note, no confession, no statement of why ten people were killed and three others wounded.
The randomness did not end because the arrests happened.
It ended because the shooting stopped.
TWO TRIALS, TWO FATES — MUHAMMAD AND MALVO
Muhammad was tried first, in Virginia, for the murder of Dean Harold Meyers.
He was convicted in November 2003 and sentenced to death.
Malvo, tried separately in Virginia for the murder of Linda Franklin, was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole.
One man was 41. The other was 17.
The prosecution argued they were equal perpetrators, two men who fired the same rifle from the same trunk.
The defense for Malvo emphasized his youth and his influence by Muhammad.
The specific arguments of the defense are not detailed in the source.
What is documented is the age. What is documented is the sentence. What is documented is the gap between them.
In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles were unconstitutional.
Malvo's sentence was later commuted to life with the possibility of parole.
Muhammad was executed by lethal injection on November 10, 2009, in Virginia.
Two trials. Two fates.
Was it justice that one died and one may one day walk out?
Was it justice that the older man's influence bought the younger man a second chance?
That would require evidence of what each man intended, and the record does not establish it.
The record establishes the convictions. It establishes the sentences. It establishes the Supreme Court's ruling.
It does not establish why the shots were fired in the first place.
Linda Franklin's husband sat through one of those trials.
He watched the man convicted of killing his wife receive a life sentence.
He has since spoken publicly about the senselessness and the sudden void.
The randomness did not end because the arrests happened.
It ended because the shooting stopped.
The tarot card said "Call me God."
No note, no confession, no statement of why ten people were killed and three others wounded.
THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES — LIVING WITH THE RANDOMNESS
Linda Franklin was an FBI analyst.
She was killed on October 14, 2002, outside a Home Depot in Falls Church, Virginia.
Her husband was with her that day.
He was not hit.
He later spoke publicly about the loss.
He described the senselessness of the killing.

He described the sudden void in his family's life.
His specific words are not quoted in the record.
What remains is the shape of what he said: a wife gone while loading purchases into a car, a family left to measure the space she filled.
She was on the ground outside the store.
The randomness is the part that does not close.
Several victims' families found each other during the trials.
They attended court together.
They supported one another in the same rooms where the men accused of the killings sat.
They shared a calendar of grief — October 2, October 3, October 4, October 9, October 11, October 14, October 22.
Each date belonged to someone else's loved one.
Together, the dates became a single season.
Families have said they still struggle with the randomness.
They struggle with the fact that no clear motive was ever established.
The tarot card said "Call me God."
No note explained it.
No confession matched it.
The shootings stopped because the men were arrested, not because a reason was found.
Franklin's husband later advocated for victims' rights.
He spoke about the long-term trauma of losing a spouse to violence.
He attended resentencing hearings to testify about the ongoing impact.
Other families did the same.
They opposed any possibility of release.
The motive question remains open.
That is not a mystery to be solved.
It is a fact to be carried.
AND THE STORY STILL ISN'T OVER
Muhammad is dead, executed in 2009.
The sentence was carried out in Virginia, by lethal injection, on November 10 of that year.
Malvo remains in prison.
He is an adult now, but the legal fight over his sentence is not finished.
In 2017, Malvo's lawyers sought resentencing.
They argued that Supreme Court rulings on juvenile sentencing applied to his case.
In 2021, a federal judge ruled that Malvo's life sentence was unconstitutional.
The judge ordered a new sentencing hearing.
Prosecutors appealed that decision.
The outcome of the appeal is not in the record.
It is not established.
What is established is that the families have not stopped appearing.
Some of them attended the resentencing hearings.
They testified about the ongoing impact of their loved ones' deaths.
They opposed any possibility of Malvo's release.
Linda Franklin's husband has advocated for victims' rights.
He has spoken about the long-term trauma of losing a spouse to violence.
Several families have said they still struggle with the randomness.
They struggle with the fact that no clear motive was ever established.
The motive question remains open.
That is not a mystery to be solved.
It is a fact to be carried.
The case is not closed.
It is a case with a dead man and a man still in prison.
It is a case with families who keep showing up.
They keep showing up because the sentence is not the end.
The sentence is a chapter.
The appeal is another chapter.
The hearings are another chapter.
Each one brings them back to the ordinary moments.
Pumping gas.
Mowing a lawn.
Loading groceries.
Sitting on a bench.
Those moments are gone.
The families carry the void.
They carry it into courtrooms.
They carry it into testimony.
They carry it into the ongoing question of what happens next.
That question has no answer in the source.
It has only a ruling, an appeal, and a waiting.
The waiting is the story now.
Advertisement





